top of page

***********************************

If we showed these legally disgusting books to minor children, we'd be arrested but not if you are an employee of a library, museum, or school.  The loophole in the law needs to be closed NOW!  It's easy to sign on to the petition. 

protect kids (3).jpg
protect kids 25 1.JPG

Climate Energy-Environment presentation

Falmouth climate.jpg

We were all hoping that the madness was going to decrease after January 20, 2025. That probably will occur nationally. However, the insanity as related to energy costs in order to save the planet will skyrocket in Massachusetts in the future. We are going to have to hit the ground running in 2025 to try to stay ahead of this.

Bob Wood has mentioned “Climate: The Movie” (1:20) (available for free viewing on YouTube) several times and our Initiative 3.7 Climate Change leaders John Densler and Les Trager have been formulating ideas to move us forward next year towards taking meaningful action on this far-reaching topic. In addition, our Initiative 3.3 Partnerships leader Erich Horgan may be able to connect us with other groups that are gravely concerned about the manipulation of society in the name of saving it.

Like us, many groups, for example, The Heartland Institute, simply want to present the truth and let that guide our policies and directions. They have put together the excellent “A Climate Conversation” (0:56), also available for free viewing on YouTube. In addition, The Heartland Institute has held 15 conferences on climate change. A recent keynote talk by Patrick Moore (co-founder of Greenpeace) is worth watching. Search on “YouTube Heartland Institute ICCC15 Patrick Moore keynote” to find it.

Everyone is encouraged to watch any or all three of the above mentioned videos to gain a better understanding of the “Climate Change Crisis” narrative and also the substantial scientific data and records that can be used to counter the propaganda. We also need to be familiar with and investigate the validity of the rebuttal(s) to Climate: The Movie.

Below are highlights from two items. One is big picture. The other is closer to home.

What follows are some excerpts from the latest issue of “The New American” magazine (December 30, 2024) (Rigging the Climate Agenda) as it reports on the recent United Nations COP29 (29th annual Conference of the Parties) conference held in Baku, Azerbaijan.

p. 5. “media...shameful propagation of climate alarmism, which ludicrously...demoniz(es) carbon dioxide, the gas of life”

p. 5 “hypocracy...(of) the elitists to consume all the energy they want....while the rest of us...(are) reduced to the level of serfs”

p. 10. “two futures...global totalitarian controls...in which all roads lead to Bejing... The other...mankind works to untangle one of the most spectacular frauds in human history.”

p. 12. “five GOP congressmen attended COP29 to show support for the Biden administration's...Inflation Reduction Act...the most significant climate legislation in history.”

p. 13. “it is time to start enforcing the climate agenda regardless of what people think, because the “crisis” is simply too urgent to wait”

p. 14. “demanded immediate and drastic changes to every element of life under the direction and guidance of the UN”

p. 14. “The goal is simple: ensure “climate change” indoctrination of all children worldwide”

p. 14. “Covid-style policies to fight the “climate crisis.”

p. 14. “And yet the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) continues to bring an estimated two coal-fired power plants online each week.”

p. 14. “climate agenda is foundational to the globalist effort to build the New World Order.”

p. 15. “The new UN climate agreement aims to destroy the Western middle class ((that's us)), reshape the global economy, and bring about a New World Order.”

p. 17. “The entire conference had a veneer of “saving the planet” from alleged “manmade climate change.” But...it became clear...climate movement and COP29 have nothing to do with bettering the environment and everything to do with globalism.”

p. 19. as related to offshore wind turbines “since they started pile driving...there has been a 400-percent increase in whale deaths”

p. 19. “The climate-change narrative is not about the environment, whales, or CO2 – it is about control.”

p. 20. “COP29...is in fact a highly organized, planned, scripted, and approved activity to promote the big hoax.”

p. 20. “the agenda...is about centralizing power around the United Nations and acquiring mass funding for globalism.”

p. 20. “A carbon tax would allow for global taxation and regulation of all human activity”

There is a reason all of the above was mentioned. It sounds so insane as to be completely unbelievable.

Unfortunately, it is very real. We have witnessed similar insanity at the southern border for four years and the United Nations played a central part in it. To make matters worse, we paid for it. Most of us on this email understand that the UN is a globalist entity that does not believe in the sovereignty of the United States and its charter was written by a Soviet agent.

Maybe the incoming administration can disable the Climate Change Hoax agenda nationally and worldwide. But, in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts the climate agenda is alive, actually thriving, and is set to fulfill many of the goals mentioned above. More that 2/3 of the legislators in our State House vote as if they do not believe in the U.S. Constitution, so what they pass as laws should not surprise us.

Almost no one in Massachusetts is raising the question of the elephant in the room. Even Green Oceans, which opposes offshore wind energy, seems to completely buy into the man-driven climate change narrative. Green Oceans says “We have banded together because our local elected officials, universities, and conservation groups – many of whom have received significant donations from wind energy developers – are not protecting our resources, our environment, or our livelihoods. We know, as does the government, that industrializing over 900,000 acres of coastal waters off RI and MA will not help climate change.” It is actually much worse than what Green Oceans states.

Please see the forwarded article below “Amidst glaring unknowns in new energy law, rate increases definite” from MassFiscal.org about upcoming energy rate hikes and their underlying cause. In the article, there is a link to “Proposed battery law costs billions and does nothing.” Keep in mind that the Massachusetts annual state budget is about $56 Billion.

Listed below are excerpts from each of those two articles. It is apparent that we have an implemented scenario in Massachusetts that is similar to the wishes of the United Nations as it pertains to required actions necessary to combat climate change and save the earth.

An Act promoting a clean energy grid, advancing equity and protecting ratepayers was recently passed by “representatives and governor approved just a week after most of them secured reelection...quietly during a rare lame duck session.”

“the law mandates the rapid purchase of tens of billions of dollars worth of huge grid scale batteries...that 1,500 megawatts (MW) of batteries must be bought by next July,,,This is around a thousand tractor trailer sized batteries...will buy you a few more hours of energy ((per day)) at best...two more huge battery buys in the near future...by July 2026 and 2027”

Other costs associated with the batteries include “facilities to house ((them)), new transmission lines and other grid upgrades...operating and maintaining...profit...biggest additional cost....interest”

“If 10 hour batteries are purchased the cost jumps to ...twenty-five billion dollars”

“If we also electrify home heat and cars it is more like a mere one hour” of energy we would gain from the massive fiscal outlay.

“Clearly this tiny bit of storage is useless for backing up solar and wind but it costs $10-25 billion or more.”

“...serious safety concerns...thousands of container sized lithium batteries...each...is an unpredictable fire threat...impossible to extinguish...toxic emissions...each...battery weighs around 80,000 pounds...100 times the weight of an EV battery and is that much more dangerous...spacing...to prevent a chain reaction”

“As this is just a very small portion of the storage we would eventually need to meet our net-zero by 2050 target, we wonder why the actual total costs haven't been revealed...leaves out the costs of transmission...costs of the windmills and solar panel build outs themselves.”

BTW the politicians are claiming after paying for all these costs, that our energy bills are going to decrease by about $400 per year. THEY THINK WE ARE STUPID.

Almost no one talks about offshore wind generation being by far the most expensive way to generate electricity.

There is no shortage if questionable aspects in this mess that started years ago such as:

  • Doing away with the requirement that future energy projects need to reduce energy costs;

  • Establishing a new Office of Environmental Justice and Equity;

  • Defining an Environmental Justice community based on race, income, and English language-proficiency criteria;

  • Equity in determining who pays for all these upgrades;

  • By 2030, having 75,000 public charging stations;

  • Emphasis on equity and environmental justice where “every action the state takes should center these concerns;”

  • Having the State require that historic commissions “give substantial weight to the threat posed by climate change;”

  • Makes it more difficult for homeowners to get a natural gas hookup;

  • Allow more private jet flights into Hanscom Field in Bedford;

  • State to develop new flood risk maps;

  • Directs the Dept. of Elementary and Secondary Education to help establish programs for offshore wind job training;

  • Report annually about EV adoption for people of color;

  • MBTA to buy only zero-emission buses by 2030;

  • Electrifying all school buses;

  • Emissions reductions from Uber and Lyft rides;

  • Large buildings to report annual emissions.

We need to look at all of this from many member perspectives to best determine how to proceed.

Bill and Pam

A pdf file of the easy to understand “Climate at a Glance For Teachers and Students” is available at:

https://heartland.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/CaaG-2022.pdf

Critical Race Theory
Medical Freedom

Medical Freedom

UCP Policy Statement

UCP Is Your Advocate For Medical Freedom!

 

UCP is an advocate of all freedoms. This includes medical freedom, which is based on the most basic God-given right, bodily autonomy. 

 

UCP strongly believes that every person has the right to take full governance over one's body, with the guarantee that one is not coerced into violating that bodily autonomy either through force, bribery, misinformation, and/or lack of full disclosure (ie. informed consent).  

 

UCP's advocacy for medical freedom adheres to the following guidelines: 

 

  • The role of an advocate is to offer support to those who feel they are not being heard, and to ensure their rights are acknowledged and respected.

 

  • Advocates use their voices, and empower others to use their voices to support a cause, or influence necessary change.

 

  • An advocate will ensure a person has the tools to make an informed decision.

Vaccines and Safety

Vaccines and Safety

Nonprofit sues HHS to Immediately stop Emergency Use Authorization of COVID-19 vaccines,  Article from The Epoch Times by LI HAI, Iuly 22, 2021 

America’s Frontline Doctors, a nonprofit, filed a motion on July 19 seeking immediate injunctive relief to stop the emergency use authorization (EUA) of COVID-19 vaccines for three groups of Americans: anyone under the age of 18, anyone who has recovered from COVID-19, and those who haven’t given informed consent as defined by federal law.

The motion was filed against Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and other defendants in a federal district court in the Northern District of Alabama.

“The emergency declaration and its multiple renewals are illegal,” the complaint (pdf) alleges.

According to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, when the HHS secretary declares that an emergency use is appropriate, the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) may then authorize unapproved use or EUA of a vaccine.

On Feb. 4, 2020, then-HHS Secretary Alex Azar declared a public health emergency, saying that existing circumstances justify the EUA.

The complaint alleges that the legal requirements to issue and maintain COVID-19 vaccine EUAs aren’t being met.

 

Department of Health and Human Services in Washington on Sept. 16, 2011. (Susan Stierch/CC 4.0)

First, there’s no underlying emergency and no “serious or life-threatening disease or condition,” the complaint states.

According to the defendants’ data, the CCP virus has an overall survivability rate of 99.8 percent globally, “on a par with the seasonal flu.”

However, the defendants’ data is deliberately inflated, the complaint alleges. It claims that HHS has changed the rules applicable to people responsible for writing death certificates and requires them to make cause of death determinations primarily attributable to COVID-19. From last March, death certificates indicated “COVID-19 [as] being the underlying cause more often than not.”

The way in which COVID-19 is diagnosed, using magnified values from PCR tests that were also authorized for emergency use, guarantees “an unacceptably high number of false-positive results,” the complaint states.

Second, COVID-19 vaccines aren’t effective in diagnosing, treating, or preventing a disease or condition, which fails another requirement for issuing and maintaining EUAs.

The complaint cites data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that says a total of 10,262 CCP virus breakthrough infections (detection of SARS-COV-2 within 14 or more days after receiving required dosages of a COVID-19 vaccine) were reported between Jan. 1 and April 30.

“It is important to note that the vaccines were only shown to reduce symptoms—not block transmission,” the complaint reads.

Third, the benefits don’t outweigh the known and potential risks of each vaccine. Those risks are especially increased in reproductive health, potential death, neurological damage, more virulent strains, and others.

And lastly, there are adequate, approved, and available alternatives to the vaccines, such as Ivermectin, Budesonide, Hydroxychloroquine, and others.

Not Adequately Informed

The plaintiffs also allege that health care professionals and vaccine candidates aren’t being adequately informed about the vaccines, as the federal law requires.

“No one ever provided me with any information regarding possible adverse reactions, nor did they provide me with any information regarding alternative treatments. I did not understand this was gene therapy rather than a traditional vaccine. Again, I also did not understand that the vaccines were not ‘approved’ by the FDA,” plaintiff Angelia Deselle said in a declaration included in the lawsuit.

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) was established to provide information regarding adverse events potentially caused by vaccines. The complaint states that VAERS isn’t accurate and that the federal government is failing to provide data from other sources, such as the military, Medicare, and Medicaid.

According to the complaint, a patient can’t give informed consent without an understanding of the risks.

Under-18 Age Group and Those Recovered From COVID-19

“CDC data indicates that children under 18 have a 99.998 percent COVID-19 recovery rate with no treatment,” the complaint reads. “Injecting this under-18 subpopulation with the Vaccines threatens them with immediate, potentially life-threatening harm.”

Last month, the CDC said that more than 1,200 cases of heart inflammation in adolescents and young adults were reported following the administration of Pfizer’s or Moderna’s two-dose vaccines.

“There is no public interest in subjecting children to experimental vaccination programs, to protect them from a disease that does not threaten them,” Dr. Angelina Farella, a pediatrician who has actively practiced for over 25 years, said in a statement. Farella is an expert for America’s Frontline Doctors.

The complaint also asserts that Americans who have recovered from COVID-19 shouldn’t get vaccinated.

It cites a recent Cleveland Clinic study that demonstrates that natural immunity through prior infection is stronger than any benefit conferred by a COVID-19 vaccine. Another study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, shows that of those with preexisting COVID-19 immunity, 89 percent reported adverse side-effects after receiving the first vaccine injection.

“COVID recovered patients are at extremely high risk to a vaccine,” plaintiffs’ expert Dr. Richard Urso said in a statement. “They have all the requisite components of immune memory. Vaccination may activate a hyperimmune response leading to a significant tissue injury and possibly death.”

Whistleblower Testimony: 45,000 Deaths Following Vaccinations

Jane Doe, a computer programmer with expertise in the health care data analytics field, filed a sworn statement indicating that the actual number of deaths following the COVID-19 vaccination is about 45,000.

“It is my professional estimate that VAERS database, while extremely useful, is under-reported by a conservative factor of at least 5. On July 9, 2021, there were 9,048 deaths reported in VAERS,” Jane Doe said in her statement (pdf).

“I queried data from CMS medical claims with regard to vaccines and patient deaths, and have assessed that the deaths occurring within 3 days of vaccination are higher than those reported in VAERS by a factor of at least 5. This would indicate the true number of vaccine-related deaths was at least 45,000.”

Jane Doe noted that the swine flu vaccine was taken off the market because of 53 deaths reported following vaccination.

“The evidence makes it irrefutable that Plaintiffs and others in the public will suffer irreparable injury … if this motion is denied,” the plaintiffs asserted. “Finally, the evidence tilts the balance of hardships and public interest … decisively in favor of Plaintiffs.”

In an email to The Epoch Times, HHS declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying, “As a matter of policy, we do not comment on pending litigation.”

President Joe Biden has praised the vaccines as safe and effective.

“You know, some people have questions about how quickly the vaccines were developed. They say they’ve been developed so quickly, they can’t be that good. Well, here’s what you need to know: Vaccines were developed over a decade of research in similar viruses, and they’ve gone through strict FDA clinical trials,” Biden said last month.

“The bottom line is this—I promise you: They are safe. They are safe. And even more importantly, they’re extremely effective.”

The Biden administration announced earlier this month that it would begin a door-to-door outreach campaign in targeted communities to boost COVID-19 vaccination rates.

CDC joins list
CDC joins the list of corrupt, Politicized Institutions

UCP Editorial 

If our government wants more Americans to consider the experimental vaccine, they should disclose the age-based risk of "COVID-19" death and the vaccine adverse event risk, including death. Americans could then make a true informed decision based on risk-benefit analysis, and the government would not be violating the Nuremberg Code.  

 

We have the data now to actually follow the (true) science, but are being told by our government to panic, put your mask back on, and get injected with the "savior" vaccine that even your life insurance will not cover. In fact, NO ONE is accepting liability for this highly dangerous, experimental jab - not the government, not the vaccine manufacturers, not the medical personnel, not the media, not the employers, literally NO ONE.   

 

The facts are that the 7 day average "COVID-19" death rate in our country is 269 per day. This is the lowest since the "pandemic" started. At the height of the "pandemic", approximately 4000 died a day from "COVID-19". To put this into perspective, we lose about 1800 a day from heart disease in this country, yet I haven't seen one CDC press conference. The PCR test used to determine these cases, was never intended to diagnose infection disease, and was just recently recalled. It is quite possible that most of the people diagnosed with "COVID-19", did not even have "COVID-19". It is quite possible that there was never a state of emergency.  

 

They asked us to flatten the curve to prevent the healthcare system from being overwhelmed. That was the goal. We did that. Then they asked us to go into lockdown until the vaccine was available. That was the goal. We did that.  

 

Now it appears we are chasing "COVID-19" case rate with the goal of "If it just saves one life". A tyrannical government uses this logic when they want to create panic and justify the need for emergency action to further their agenda - think climate emergency or racism as a public health crisis. In each of these examples you can't see or measure the problem, but we are being told it is so dire the government needs to step in and restrict your freedoms.

 

The left has politicized and destroyed confidence in most all major institutions. Examples of why Americans no longer trust what our government is telling us include: Trump as a Russian asset, Kavanaugh as a serial gang rapist, and Biden is our President. 

 

The lost confidence institutions now includes the CDC, as they advise we should continue masking our children. This segment of the population represents 75 million Americans, and has a higher chance of dying from drowning than "COVID-19". Applying their "If it just saves one life" logic, we could save more lives by mandating floaties on children instead of masks. Further, these ABC-organizations, and "leaders" such as Fauci are not looking into the physical, mental, emotional, AND spiritual implications of masking our children and those around them. This is flat-out child abuse. Our children deserve better.  

UCP Position on Black Lives Matter in Schools
BLM in Schools

UCP Policy Statement

United Cape Patriots (UCP) unequivocally rejects efforts by the organization Black Lives Matter to influence, alter, or otherwise intervene in the curriculum and function of schools on the Cape and elsewhere. 

 

BLM is a self-proclaimed Marxist organization that is steeped in the philosophy of The Communist Manifesto authors Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Marxism is not merely an economic theory, it is an anti-capitalist/anti-free market political theory that aims to understand relations between social classes and work toward a society in which all toil for a "common good." Every attempt to establish such a society via communism, socialism, depostism, or some combination thereof, has not only failed, but ruined or ended the lives of countless millions.

 

As Hillsdale president Larry Arnn writes in his book Liberty and Learning, "Marx and his siblings and prodigy...would give rise to many movements that denied the natural rights of every human being." 

 

The core tenets of Marxism have slowly become prevalent in American schools, media, politics, and culture, often masked in benign terms such as democratic socialism (espoused by U.S. senator Bernie Sanders), progressivism (dating back to Woodrow Wilson), and social justice (BLM, Critical Race Theory, universal health care, guaranteed income). Marxism is in diametric opposition to the American cause, but in its various forms and euphemisms has infected the body politic. 

 

"BLM at School" is a curriculum designed by the organization and is being adopted in school districts across the country, including Massachusetts. The curriculum is for nearly all grade levels with an emphasis upon concepts such as "whiteness", "confronting whiteness", and "white privilege". 

 

The mantra is that white people established the systemically racist hellscape otherwise known as the United States and that all whites, regardless of the content of their character or their station in life, are guilty by default. The natural rights of white people do not count.

 

The curriculum is presented with a moral certitude. Concerned parents whose children have been exposed to BLM at School have noted that dissent or critiques of the curriculum are, at best, not entertained and, at worst, labeled as racist. 

 

As University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire political science professor Peter Myers wrote in City Journal:

 

"On its own [the BLM curriculum] is not good history and tends to poison students' minds toward their country, especially students who need to be encouraged by the idea that the country does not provide opportunities people like them." 

 

BLM seems to be imploding. The slightest journalistic effort uncovered a BLM co-founder's curious ability to acquire expensive real estate. That co-founder has since left the organization. Other leaders are leaving in protest after discovering that BLM is not really what it seems. Families of those BLM purports to lift up aren't seeing a dime of funds that BLM raised in their names. 

 

Yet such setbacks will not deter those who seek to demolish what is left of traditional curriculum and time-tested educational strategies in order to establish a race-centered program of indoctrination, hatred, and division. Such radicals are not interested in educational excellence or the study of the principles of human freedom -- truth, nobility, and beauty. 

 

Parents of school-aged children, property taxpayers, and all citizens must remain vigilant. A republic is only as good as an educational system that produces virtuous citizens who understand ordered liberty, the Constitution, and the quest for a more perfect union. Rather than work toward that end, BLM is attempting to turn our national motto -- E pluribus unum -- on its head. 

 

UCP encourages citizens to engage with school boards that are considering BLM in the Classroom; register objections and push back against any and all attempts to indoctrinate schoolchildren and further balkanize this country. You have an ally in us. 

 

UCP is an action-oriented grassroots nonpartisan organization that adheres to the founding principles of the Republic and the original construction of the United States Constitution in order to advance limited government and the sovereignty of the people through engagement with elected officials and servants of the public. Consider joining us and attending an event by visiting www.unitedcapepatriots.com

 

Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

unitedcapepatriots

@gmail.com

DhsJoke.png
rumble.png
  • Facebook
bottom of page